1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continuation from LIC 9099
The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation “Staff yelled at residents.” During interviews conducted, 0 out of 6 residents agreed with the allegation. 4 out of 6 residents disagreed with the allegation, resident R1 stated “I don’t remember to be honest to you.” 2 out of 6 residents refused to be interviewed. 0 out of 3 staff agreed with the allegation. 3 out of 3 staff interviewed disagreed with the allegation staff S1 stated “I am not aware of that we have ongoing training.” Witness (W1) stated, “No, I have never witnessed nor heard any staff yelling at residents”. “Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.”
Regarding the allegation “Staff failed to treat resident with respect.” During interviews conducted, 2 out of 6 residents agreed with the allegation, resident R1 stated,” Yes, staff failed to treat me with respect” 2 out of 6 residents disagreed with the allegation, resident R5 stated “Staff don’t never fail to treat us with respect they are very nice.” 2 out of 6 residents refused to be interviewed. 0 out of 3 staff agreed with the allegation. 3 out of 3 staff interviewed disagreed with the allegation staff S3 stated “I have never seen or heard any staff fail to treat residents with respect.” Witness (W1) stated, “No, I have never witnessed any staff treating residents lacking respect”. “Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.”
No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to Cecilio Sapp. |