1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff did not prevent a resident from eloping while in care- Reporting Party (RP) alleges that on 1/11/25,Resident#1 (R1) was identified as wandering around the Griffith Park area unattended.
To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted a interviews with staff, which revealed the following: Both Administrator and Staff Director (S1) state that, is spite of R1's dementia diagnosis, the facility's initial pre-placement assessment indicated R1 was on a the "high functioning" end of the dementia spectrum. This resulted in the facility placing R1 as an Assisted Living (AL) resident, with frequent observation and reassessment to determine if AL is the optimal placement. (Per 6/7/24 Needs and Services Plan documentation)
Per the Administrator, from R1's initial placement, R1 was placed on a list of AL residents, "who cannot leave the facility unassisted". The aforementioned list is given to staff during shift meetings and are instructed to provide enhanced vigilance regarding the supervision and frequent well checks of these residents.
Per the Administrator, the facility currently does not have surveillance cameras to visually monitor common areas and perimeter entry/exit points. However, after R1's elopement, the installation of such cameras and the use of fobs tracking resident's distance from the facility's perimeter is being considered in the licensee's strategy to mitigate the occurrence of resident elopement.
LPA review of R1's file and other relevant documents reveals the following: Regarding R1's mental condition, pre-placement appraisal documentation simply states "withdrawn"; omitting PCP's diagnosis. Additionally, staff assessment identifies R1 as "Independent". Thus, needed no redirection, interventions, or room visits.
Therefore:Based on information obtained through documents review and interviews, sufficient evidence was found to sustain the above allegation as Substantiated. |