1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | duty revealed that, the staff has limited interaction with S1 due to working different shifts/days and work duties. S1 works in the front office and dispense medication to residents in the office or delivers to residents room for those whom do not come to the office to receive their medications, also S1 is observed to be quite, nice and keeps to self and appears to eat lunch and take breaks in the car. During the investigation it was revealed that R1 had spoken to various witness and made inconsistent statements regarding the encounter with S1 and has made false allegations in the past. R1 was interviewed on 11/19/2021 and at a later date of 12/09/2021 by Investigator Santana at approximately 3:00pm regarding claims by R1 which was observed through video surveillance to be false. R1 had no explanation regarding the discrepancies. R1 asked Investigator Santana more than once whether the allegation could be used to avert an impending eviction for possessing, distributing, and consuming alcohol at the facility.
Based on interviews, observations, and record review, there is a not enough corroborating evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
No deficiencies cited, Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, and appeal rights issued.
#2. Facility staff member is impaired while caring for residents.
It is alleged that Staff #1 (S1) is always high, smokes marijuana while at work in the car and had offered R1 marijuana. To investigation the above allegation, interviews were conducted with staff and residents on 11/23/2021 and 04/29/2022. Interviews conducted on 11/23/21 began at approximately 2:30pm and 04/29/2022 at 9:15am, with eleven (11) out of (12) residents have not witnessed staff under the influence of drugs or alcohol while on duty. During the investigation interviews with five (5) out of (5) staff confirmed that no staff have been witnessed to be under the influence of drugs or alcohol while on duty. Based on interviews, and observations, there is a not enough corroborating evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
No deficiencies cited, Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, and appeal rights issued.
Continued on LIC9099C |