1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Investigator Santana reviewed facility and medical documents on 8/25/2020 and 9/22/2020; interviewed R1 on 8/20/2020; interviewed a collateral agency representative on 8/24/2020; interviewed a family member on 8/24/2020, 9/2/2020, 9/15/2020 and 10/15/2020; interviewed R1’s primary care physician on 8/25/2020 and 9/11/2020; and, interviewed R1’s psychiatrist on 10/2/2020. Investigator Santana also conducted the following staff interviews: three interviews on 9/17/2020, one interview on 9/23/2020; one interviews on 10/22/2020; one interview on 11/09/2020; seven interviews on 11/12/2020; five interviews on 11/13/2020; one interview on 11/18/2020; five interviews on 11/19/2020; one interview on 11/20/2020; one interview on 12/4/2020; one interview on 12/10/2020; one interview on 12/11/2020; and, one interview on 12/14/2020.
Regarding the allegation: Due to lack of supervision, resident sustained injuries while in care
It was alleged that R1 sustained multiple bruises and injuries due to lack of supervision. Injuries included, but were not limited to: discoloration on R1’s right wrist on 12/8/2019, scratches to R1’s hand on 12/17/2019, skin tear to the right elbow on 12/18/2019, swollen and bruised middle finger on the left hand on 12/21/2019, laceration of R1’s nose on 1/13/2020, and bruising to the right temple on 1/26/2020. There was a concern with the frequency of injuries and the unexplained origin of the bruising.
A review of Facility Progress Notes pertaining to R1 revealed that within a seven week span, the following incidents involved R1 displaying aggression either towards staff or residents:12/8/2019, 12/17/2019, 12/20/2019, 12/27/2019, 1/6/2020, 1/7/2020, 1/8/2020, 1/13/2020, 1/14/2020, 1/15/2020, 1/17/2020, 1/18/2020, 1/19/2020, 1/25/2020, and 1/26/2020. Interviews revealed that the multiple incidents appeared ‘above average’ and believed that the bruising and skin tears may have resulted from the above-mentioned incidents. However, interviews also revealed that R1 was often observed with bruises, cuts, and bleeding, but the origin of the injury was oftentimes unknown at the time of observation.
Interviews revealed that R1 was combative and aggressive towards residents and staff, yet appeared to work well with female staff. However, some staff, both female and male, disclosed that they feared working with R1 due to the heightened risk of injury and unpredictable behavior; and, some revealed that they would refuse to provide care and oversight for R1. Many described numerous occasions where R1 chased staff through facility halls, would throw things, and would become violent towards staff that attempted to assist R1 with activities of daily living. Staff shared that to address aggressive behavior, they would redirect or distract a resident, try to identify a different staff that the resident could get along with, or attempt to intervene at a later time. However, pertaining to R1, some staff admitted to not returning to provide care and assistance. |