1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | No residents are observed exiting the bedroom at this time. S1 appears to have walked to the Front Wellness area. At approximately 6:58am, a different staff checks only the room across from R1’s room, but no other room. At approximately 7:06am, two unidentified females (possible other agency staff) are observed walking down the hallway by R1’s room. The two females slow down by R1’s room and look towards the room and then continue to walk. At approximately 9:08am, S1 walks into R1’s room and walks back out; and then, at 9:10am, S1 walks back into R1’s room. The video surveillance footage shows facility staff #2 (S2) and staff #3 (S3) walking to R1’s room. In addition, at 9:11am, staff #4 (S4) is observed walking into the room as well. At 9:13am, S2 walks out R1’s bedroom to a different room then walks back to R1’s room with an item of clothing and what appears to be an adult diaper. At 9:15am, S1 walks out to the room next to R1s room. At 9:16am, S2 walks R3 out of R1’s room in to R3’s room wearing only adult diapers and transfers R3 over to S1. S2 then walks back into R1’s bedroom. At 9:17am, S2 and S3 appear to be standing outside the door of R1’s room and S4 arrives at the scene and is observed having a conversation with the two staff. At 9:20am, two caregivers are observed finally removing R2 out of R1’s room while S2 and S3 hold R1 back.
Interviews conducted revealed that that facility caregivers were aware of R1’s behavior and were informed to monitor R1 closely, at least every 30 minutes. However, staff failed to redirect residents, even after being found in the room the first time at 6:54am. When staff did a check/rounds at 9:08am, R1 and R2 were in R1’s bed, undressed from the waist down, and R3 was on the other bed in the room, wearing only adult diapers. R1, R2 and R3 were left unsupervised in R1s room for approximately 2 hours and 58 minutes.
Interviews conducted and documents reviewed further reflected that R2’s POA did not have the legal authority to give consent to R2’s relationships; and, R2 did not have the mental capacity to consent to being in bed with R1. Based on all information gathered, there is sufficient evidence to determine that due to lack of care and supervision and R2’s serious disability, R2 was a victim of sexual battery by R1. Based on the evidence obtained, the LPA was unable to determine if there were any inappropriate actions involving R3.
The licensee was informed that additional civil penalties might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(e) or (f), or 1548(e) or (f), 1568.0822(e) or (f).
Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following deficiency will be cited (refer to LIC 809-D).
Exit interview conducted/ Appeal rights provided/ A copy of this report was emailed for signature.
|