1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Staff spoke inappropriate about resident. It’s being alleged that a facility staff member made an inappropriate comment to another staff regarding a resident. R2-6 all state the staff speak to them in an appropriate manner. R2 states, “oh yes, the staff treat me with dignity and respect.” R3 states, “the facility has excellent staff.” R4,5 and 6 state not having any issues with staff and that they are polite. R1 states while just waking up S4 informed them to “cover-up” do to being exposed. R1 states that S4 then told S6 what happened.” S1 states the incident did occur but that S4 mentioned it to S6 as a “form of reporting the incident” and not in a way to embarrass R1. S2-6 all state the residents are spoken to appropriately.
Regarding the allegation: facility not following COVID protocols. It’s being alleged the facility is not screening visitors for covid. R1 states that the “facility opened up too fast.” R1 states the facility does not take temperatures and don’t ask for vaccination cards from visitors. R1 states not leaving their apartment since the beginning of the outbreak. LPA observed the facility to have a screening tool, that measures your temperature and asks questions regarding covid 19 exposure. A vaccination or covid test was requested upon entry. R2-6 all agree the facility follows covid protocols. R2 states yes, they follow protocol sometimes “too much”. R4 state in addition to the facility following protocol they are informed about covid updates via a facility newsletter. S1-6 all acknowledged the covid protocols in place are followed. S3 state they stress the protocols during a monthly associate meeting. S4 states staff and visitors are screened daily. S6 states the facility is very strict surrounding covid.
Based on LPA’s observation, interviews conducted, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation(s) may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An Exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was given. |