1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During interviews with residents (R#1-R#4), 4 out of 4 stated that they know their rights as residents of an RCFE and that they can access the telephone when needed. In addition, 4 out of 4 said that when using the phone, their calls are private, and no staff has ever intervened in their conversations or snatched the phone away.
On 12/1/23 LPA returned to facility and reviewed R#1"s file and LIC 812 was created to document LPA's findings. In addition LPA interviewed R#1's and asked the following: R#1 stated that she has not spoken with RP recently, but R#1 said that if RP calls, they will receive their call. In addition, R#1 stated that they have not had any problems with RP before.
During this investigation, LPA found did not find sufficient evident to support the above-mentioned allegations.
Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above-mentioned allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8).
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was given to Dana Anderson/Administrator.
This report serves as an amendment to clarify the findings. It does not supersede the complaint investigation findings reflected on report created on 9/7/2023.
|