1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Cont from 9099)
to physically harm Client #1(C1), after C1 tried to speak with the police that was at the property for another incident. S1 and C1 had verbal altercation.
LPA interviewed C1verified that they had verbal altercation but was unable to provide details. LPA interviewed S1 via telephone and they denied the allegation. The information provided by S1 was consistent with accounts from other staff members. The Co- Administrator and staff interviews revealed that they did not make verbal threats to physically harm C1. Staff reported that C1 consistently displays threatening behavior toward staff members. During the investigation, LPA did not observe staff interacting with clients in an inappropriate manner.
Based on observation, interviews and documents review there is insufficient information to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Staff are not providing adequate food service
It was alleged that on 02/20/25 C1 woke up late and requested staff #2, (S2) to make food and S2 declined to make C1 food. During the interview with C1 they indicate that there is always food but sometimes they don’t want to eat it. C1 sometimes wants different food to be made, and staff refuse. Staff interviews reveal that C1 complaints about the food but still eats it. Co – Administrator indicated that have not received any complaints about inadequate food service from other clients in care. The facility provides alternative food if clients do not like what is being served for the day. Co- Administrator indicated that staff are always making sure the food menu is created with clients’ favorites and are open for client’s suggestions. LPA interview via phone and denied the allegation. S2 indicated that C1 always wakes up late and C1’s food is always saved when they wake up. All clients received the same food as indicated on the menu. Client interviews reveal that they did not have any concerns about the food service. Overall, the food is good. Client’s interviews confirm that the facility has alternative food which is available per clients’ request. A review of the facility’s main menu and alternative options supported the information provided by the staff.
Based on observation, interviews and documents review there is insufficient information to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
No health and safety hazards were noted during this visit.
Exit interview conducted/copy of report provided.
|