1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (cont from 9099)
Staff did not protect a cognitively impaired resident from repeated inappropriate contact by another resident
It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1), who has cognitive impairment, was taken advantage of in a sexual manner by Resident #2 (R2), who does not have cognitive impairment. Staff revealed that they had no knowledge of any incidents of inappropriate or sexual contact made by R2 towards R1.
R2 denied taking advantage of R1. LPA Smith attempted to interview R1, but they were unable to respond to the questions. Residents denied seeing inappropriate interactions between R1 and R2 or between other residents. Interview with party relevant to the investigation did not provide any concrete and verifiable information to support the allegation. A review of facility records did not reveal any information to verify the allegation.
Based on interviews and record review, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation above. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Staff does not ensure residents are treated with dignity and respect in their personal relationships with other residents
Concerns were addressed that Resident #3 (R3) was attempting to report incidents at the facility and was ignored by staff. The ED and staff denied ignoring or any untoward behavior toward residents. They revealed that they are all respectful to all residents and no resident came to report any incident(s) to them regarding the allegations. R3 was interviewed and was unable to clarify staff they reported incident(s) to, and which staff were ignoring them. The residents interviewed indicated that they are being treated with dignity and respect. Review of licensing records and facility incident reports did not reveal any information to support the allegation.
Based on interviews and record review, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation above. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. |