1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Resident had stage 3 pressure injury.
It was alleged that R1 developed a stage three pressure injury due to neglect. Records review indicated a stage II pressure injury on 06/09/2021, with notes stating a formal home health order would be completed and in effect 6/14/2021. Yet records revealed that the home health care began on 07/07/2021. It was further documented that weekly wound care monitoring was to be conducted by home health, and that the facility administrator – whom was an appropriately skilled professional – would perform daily wound care otherwise. Information obtained from staff interviews negated claims that R1 had a stage III pressure injury while in the facility, and noted that home health was caring for the wound. Prior to hospitalization, it was alleged that the wound was staged at a stage II. Facility staff claimed that R1 was regularly repositioned and wound care was provided. Records review demonstrated that upon being hospitalized on 8/9/2021, R1 was found to have a stage III pressure injury on the sacral and right elbow. Further review notated that R1’s wounds were staged and photographed on 08/10/2021. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that the stage III wound developed in the facility, as the home health nursing observing R1’s wound did not stage it above a stage II, and the wound had been stabilized as a stage II wound a month prior to R1 being hospitalized. Based on the availability of evidence, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that due to facility neglect, R1 developed a stage III pressure injury while residing in the facility. This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Regarding the allegation: Medications administered to resident with no doctor's orders.
It was alleged that Risperidone was administered to R1 on 4/23/2021, yet it was not ordered until 05/20/2021. Staff interviews and interviews with R1’s primary care physician negated claims that R1 could have received Risperidone prior to 05/20/2021, as the medication would only be provided by R1’s primary pharmacy, and staff denied claims that they had the medication in their possession to assist the resident with the self-administration of the medication on 4/23/2021. R1’s primary care physician claimed that there were two orders for Risperidone – 5/20/2021 – 6/17/2021, and 6/16/2021 – 6/22/2021. It is believed that the Risperidone was documented on the facility Medication Administration Record (MAR) in error, and at the time of the complaint initiation, R1’s medications had been destroyed and no additional supporting documents could be provided. |