1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | 1.) Staff did not prevent a resident from developing pressure injuries while in care. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) developed four (4) stage two (2) pressure injuries while in care. Per record review and interviews, R1 was admitted to the facility on 12/05/2024 and resided at the facility for two (2) weeks. Per record review, R1 resided at a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) from 10/29/2024 to 12/05/2024. SNF documents noted R1 will be receiving “Wound/Treatment Plans” however no further details regarding R1’s wound were documented. Per R1’s physician report, dated 11/21/2024 and appraisal/ needs and service plan dated 12/05/2024 no wounds/ pressure injuries were documented. Per R1’s physician report, under “History of skin condition or breakdown” it was checked off “No.” Interview with the Administrator, Elena Kordonskiy stated that R1 only resided in the facility for two (2) weeks and was on hospice services. The Administrator stated that R1 was admitted to the facility with wounds but could not describe what stage the wounds were or if the wounds were being treated by staff or hospice. On 1/08/2025, LPA Peraldi contacted R1’s hospice agency to request R1’s care plan, however the hospice agency indicated that R1 was not their patient. The information obtained during the investigation did not include sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. 2.) Staff are unable to effectively communicate with a resident in care. It was alleged that facility staff do not speak English. Interviews with the Administrator explained that care staff are able to communicate with residents with the English they do speak and if care staff need assistance, they call her to translate. Interviews with residents did not express any concern regarding how staff communicate. The information obtained during the investigation did not include sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. 3.) Meals do not consist of an appropriate variety of foods. It was alleged that staff were serving the resident's sandwiches with soup every day for dinner. Interviews with four (4) out of four (4) residents revealed that staff serve them the same variety of food every day, which included soup. Three (3) out of four (4) residents stated that they enjoy the food being served and did not express concerns. One (1) out of four (4) residents expressed disliking the food served. Staff interviewed explained that they serve the residents chicken, French fries, salads, soup and fruits. During the physical plant tour, the LPAs observed a variety of nonperishable and perishable food. The information obtained during the investigation did not include sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued to the former licensee mail for signature. |