1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed that Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to this facility on 11/12/2021. Interviews and records review revealed that R1 was discharged from a skilled nursing facility, in which R1 had recently had a stroke and was diagnosed with a stage two pressure injury. However, the pressure injury had healed. R1 was admitted to this facility with home health services for speech, occupational, and physical therapy.
Interviews revealed that on 1/12/2022, R1 was visited by home health and R1 was observed with a wound on the coccyx. The wound was diagnosed as a stage two pressure injury. As such, home health requested an order for an air mattress and on 1/13/2022, home health requested an order for staff to reposition R1 every two hours. Home health requested an additional wound evaluation, yet R1’s primary care physician noted that R1 needed to be seen by their provider to determine appropriate treatment. Thereafter, the frequency of home health visits increased to approximately three times a week due to the progression of the wound.
Prior to this, medical records confirmed that facility staff communicated to R1’s primary care physician that if R1’s wound was staged above a stage two, the facility would be unable to retain R1 in this facility. Thus, R1 had an appointment with their primary care physician on 1/19/2022. Interviews confirmed that staff were not immediately notified regarding the staging of R1’s pressure injury after the 1/19/2022 physician’s visit. In fact, medical records review confirmed that on 1/21/2022, facility staff sent a note to R1’s physician, requesting information regarding the staging of the wound. Thereafter, R1’s physician sent over documentation, confirming that the wound was evaluated as a ‘stage three-four pressure injury’. After receiving the documentation, the facility recognized that R1 needed a higher level of care, and R1 was sent to the emergency room on 1/21/2022. R1 was admitted to the hospital and was discharged to a skilled nursing facility on 1/22/2022 for wound care. R1 did not return to the facility.
Staff claimed to have regularly repositioned R1, yet it was communicated by the majority of staff that R1 was resistant to repositioning and would oftentimes ‘return’ to an original position after being repositioned. An interview with home health confirmed that home health had no concerns regarding the care that R1 received at the facility and believed there was insufficient evidence to claim that staff failed to reposition R1, as wounds can rapidly progress within hours.
CONT 9099-C |