1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff did not keep resident(s) free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse or other acts of a punitive nature.
It was alleged that S2 would yell and threaten to hit R1. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator, two (2) staff and three (3) out of four (4) residents, who were able to communicate. Interview with the Administrator revealed that S2 was an amazing caregiver and provided care to all residents with dignity and respect. Moreover, only one (1) out of four (4) residents was present during R1’s stay at this facility, who corroborated Administrator's statement. Interview with two new staff members revealed that all resident's personal rights are being respected. Lastly, three (3) out of four (4) residents interviewed expressed no concerns regarding the above allegation. Therefore, based on interviews this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Allegation: Staff did not provide adequate required incontinent care to resident(s).
During the initial visit conducted on 07/07/23, LPA observed all residents wear clean clothes, groomed and well taken care of. Interview with the Administrator and two (2) staff members revealed that all residents are being changed every 2-3 hours or as needed. Three (3) out of four (4) residents interviewed expressed no concern regarding the above allegation. Therefore, based on LPA's observation and interviews conducted, this allegations is deemed Unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted appeal rights explained and copy of this report provided to the Administrator. |