1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation #2: Staff embarrassed a client while in care.
It is alleged that staff embarrassed a client while in care. Regarding this allegation it was reported that Client #1 (C1) and the Administrator were at Walmart for an outing where there was an accident in the candy isle and some candy was spilled. When C1 and the Administrator were at the checkout, the Administrator began to yell at C1 in front of others causing C1 to be embarrassed. During the interview the Administrator denied this allegation stating that the incident did not happen like it was reported. The Administrator stated that they noticed that C1 had pocketed a candy based on the observations of the cashier and C1’s suspicious behavior. Administrator states that they were simply addressing the situation in the moment that it was discovered that C1 had a candy in their pocket and that at no point did the Administrator embarrass C1. Interview with two (2) out of three (3) clients revealed that Administrator did and has in fact yelled at clients while in the presence of others causing them to be embarrassed. Furthermore, it was revealed by clients and staff that other staff members have yelled at clients on multiple occasions with the intent to humiliate and embarrass them. Interview with staff members and clients revealed that that Administrator admitted to yelling at C1 and then recanted the admission. Therefore, based on observations and interviews this allegation is deemed Substantiated.
Allegation #3: Staff inappropriately grabbed a client.
It is alleged that staff inappropriately grabbed a client. Regarding this allegation it was reported that Client #1 (C1) and the Administrator were at Walmart for an outing where there was an accident in the candy isle and some candy was spilled. C1 misunderstood a Walmart employee’s wink as the ok to pocket one of the spilled candies. When C1 and the Administrator were at the checkout, the Administrator grabbed C1 in front of others to pull C1’s hand out of their pocket to reveal the candy. During the interview the Administrator denied this allegation stating that they were simply addressing the situation in the moment that it was discovered that C1 had a candy in their pocket, but that they never laid hands of C1. Administrator also denied the scenario reported above, stating that C1 took candy with the intent to steal. Interview with C1 revealed that while C1 does admit to stealing, that Administrator did in fact grab C1’s hand while in the presence of others and later tried to coach C1 into stating that Administrator did not touch C1. Interview with staff members revealed that that Administrator admitted to grabbing C1’s hand and then recanted the admission. Therefore, based on observations and interviews this allegation is deemed Substantiated.
Civil Penalty issued. Appeals rights discussed and provided. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was given to Administrator.
|