1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Authorization to release of records was dated 6/1/23 and a check dated 6/7/23 were hand delivered to the facility by a copying services company, Titan Legal Services, Inc on 6/9/23. Also included in the package delivered on 6/9/23 were a Authorization to Handle Claim, HIPAA Compliant Authorization for the Release of Patient Information Pursuant to 45 CFR 164.596, Certification of Vital Record, Declaration of family member as successor to Resident #1, a copy of family members Driver License and a Declaration of Custodian 0f Records. Per the Administrator, the request and documents included in the package were confusing. Per the Administrator, she was not sure whose documents were being requested since there was a copy of a Driver License belonging to someone who was much younger than the usual facility resident. The Administrator reached out to Titan Legal Services on 6/14/23 and spoke to a female staff. The Administrator does not remember the name of the female that she spoke with at Titan Legal Services to clarify the file being requested and the availability of those documents at the facility. Per the Administrator, she informed this person, that she did not have young residents and requested time from the copying company to review her records. While this was occurring, the Administrator did not contact the law firm requesting Resident #1's file and relied on her contact with Titan Legal Services, Inc regarding the time allowed to produce the documents requested. Per the information obtained from staff at the law firm they also made attempts to reach the Licensee on 6/13/23 and 6/19/23 and were not able to leave a message as the voicemail was full. Law firm staff handling the collection of documents for this case also denied that they spoke with the Administrator. Per law firm staff, they would have gladly clarified the documents being requested if the Administrator had called them.
As a result of the Administrator's confusion with whose documents were being requested and the failure to timely follow up with the production of Resident #1's file within 2 business days, the above allegation is substantiated.
Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8
Exit interview was conducted with the Administrator via telephone and Arev Misakyan was provided with a copy of the licensing report. |