1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was alleged that staff did not dispense medication as prescribed by physician. LPA conducted a medication review for three (3) residents between 11:24AM – 1:05PM. LPA observed the centrally stored medication and destruction record (CSMDR) for Resident #1 (R1) and observed three (3) medication errors. Medication counts for Melatonin 10 mg, Trazadone 50 mg, and Acetaminophen 15 mL were off and could not be accounted for. The administration instructions from the doctor’s order for the Acetaminophen stated “take 15 mLs by mouth every 6 hours Not to exceed 3000 mg Acetaminophen from all sources per 24 hours..indications: fever, pain, temp > 100F, mild pain 1-3/10.” Meanwhile, the instructions on the facility’s CSMDR stated “15 mLs every 6 hours/as needed.” The start date on the CSMDR was missing, however LPA observed a label on the bottle stating the medication was opened on 08/28/2024. Interviews with Staff #1 (S1), Lead Caregiver (LC), and Licensee Kalistratov revealed that that the Acetaminophen was not being administered every 6 hours as prescribed. LC stated that the medication was started on 08/28/2024 and was given once per day. However, the serving size is 15 mL and the bottle quantity is 473 mL, meaning that there are about 31.5 servings per bottle and therefore, the bottle would have finished around 09/28/2024 if administered as LC stated. The label also states that the medication is to be administered every 6 hours, not once per day. S1 and LC stated that R1 is asleep for most of the day and night, and they have difficulty waking the resident up for the medication, however, no documentation could be provided. S1, LC, and Licensee also stated that there were difficulties in interpreting the label since it says for pain and/or fever. S1, LC, and Licensee stated that the Acetaminophen was given routinely, however, LPA obtained evidence from credible sources revealing that the Acetaminophen was believed to be a PRN medication by the facility and is also why the medication count was off. Based on medication review, interviews, and record review, the allegation “Staff did not dispense medication as prescribed by physician” is deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time.
The following deficiency was observed (See LIC 9099-D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or California Health and Safety Code. Administrator was informed that failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties.
Licensee was unable to stay for the duration of the visit and designated staff Arystanbek Yeshibayev to sign the report.
Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights and a copy of the report was provided.
|