1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | R1's, Physician's Report dated 03/04/2020 revealed R1 was "able to feed self", Appraisal dated 03/04/2020 reported R1 did not need help with eating. Interviews with the licensee revealed R1 had started to refuse to eat and he notified R1's family. According to the licensee, the facility had open communication with R1's family, informing them of R1's refusals. LPA reviewed facility progress notes from 03/20/2020 to 10/10/2020, notes revealed R1's refusals and the times R1's "family was made aware". According to the licensee, staff assisted R1 with eating but it was not "total care". Furthermore, interviews with the administrator and other staff revealed R1 had refused assistance for various things such as repositioning, incontinent care and eating. According to the licensee, due to residents decline in health and change in condition a Reappraisal and Appraisal/Needs and Services dated 10/07/2023 were conducted and facility noted R1 needed help with eating. R1 was transferred out of the facility on 10/10/2020. LPA Rios attempted to contact R1's family but was unsuccessful. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation staff did not meet the needs of the resident. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Allegation #2: Illegal Eviction.
It is alleged the licensee refused to take the resident #1 (R1) back on two different occasions when R1 was discharged from the hospital. To investigate the allegation LPA conducted interviews with the licensee and the administrator on 10/10/2023 and 10/17/2023. According to the licensee, R1 was never evicted. On the first occasion the facility was notified by the hospital that R1 was ready for discharge but the facility felt R1's wound was not getting better. Licensee notified R1's family, that it would be best for R1 to be in a "24/7 nursing care". Licensee states they did admit R1 back to the facility after both of R1's hospital discharges and continued to encourage R1's family to consider skilled nursing services because the facility and the wound care nurse believed R1's wound was not improving and the facility could not "address R1's current needs". According to licensee an eviction notice was not issued and unnecessary because R1's family decided to transfer R1 to "another board and care". Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove that R1 was Illegally Evicted. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Administrator advised and a copy of this report issued.
|