1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Failure to provide sufficient care.
On 05/13/2020, the Department received a complaint in which it was alleged that the facility staff did not provided sufficient care to R1 subsequent to an injury sustained in a fall while in the facility resulting in a decline in medical condition. Interview conducted on 05/22/2020, with the Licensee confirmed that R1 fell and sustained a broken arm on or around the date 04/30/2020. The Licensee explained that R1 was mopping the floor prior to the fall. The Licensee explained that R1 enjoyed cleaning and that staff would advise R1 not to clean. The Licensee stated that they were present during the fall, as well as two (2) other staff. The Licensee explained that after the fall, they made cleaning equipment’s such as mops inaccessible. After R1’s fall and hospitalization, R1 was discharged back to the facility with Home Health Services to treat a pressure injury and to provide physical therapy. On 09/08/2022, LPA Peraldi attempted to call R1’s emergency contact, but the phone number appeared to be disconnected. On 09/08/2022, LPA Peraldi interviewed R1’s Home Health Nurse. R1’s Home Health Nurse stated that R1 was being taken care of well by facility staff and had no concerns regarding the facility or the facility staff. On 09/07/2022, LPA Peraldi reviewed all available documents and interviews obtained during the previous investigations. LPA Peraldi reviewed a note from R1’s Home Health wound care specialist that stated R1’s wounds were improving and that R1 will benefit from staying at the facility. On 09/08/2022, LPA Peraldi called R1’s Home Health Agency to confirm the contexts of the note and to interview the wound care specialist. However, LPA Peraldi was not able to confirm the note or speak to R1’s wound care specialist as it appeared that R1’s wound care specialist was no longer employed at the home health agency. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued to the Licensee via email. |