1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Manager at 1:35PM and toured the facility at 1:53PM. The following was then determined:
Regarding the allegation: “Lack of care and supervision led to resident’s death:”
Resident #1 (R1) who was admitted to the facility on 09/30/2020, had previously resided at another licensed facility and had been under hospice care since 03/15/2020. Interviews revealed that during the three (3) days R1 resided at this facility, R1 was noted to be not eating well. On the morning of 10/03/2020, facility staff indicated R1 appeared to be weak, refusing meals, and having shortness of breath. R1’s hospice provider was contacted, arrived at the facility and called 9-1-1. The resident was then transported to the hospital, where R1 expired the same day. Record review revealed R1’s death was attributed to probable sepsis, chronic pressure wounds, and cardiovascular disease. Interviews confirmed R1 had a long history of self-neglect and the conditions surrounding R1’s passing were aligned with R1’s history of refusal regarding medical care. Medical professionals concurred that there was nothing suspicious or unexpected regarding R1’s expiration. Reports reviewed revealed there was no indication of any abuse or neglect by the facility staff. Based on interviews and records review, at this time there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that “lack of care and supervision led to resident’s death.” Therefore, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Regarding the allegation “Resident sustained multiple pressure injuries while in care:”
R1 was admitted to the facility on 09/30/2020 and had been under hospice care since 03/15/2020. Hospice admission documents, as well as facility admission paperwork, indicated the resident had pressure injuries on the sacro coccyx area (Stage IV) and on the buttocks area (Stage III), for which the Hospice agency was responsible for providing appropriate medical care. While the resident was noted to have decubitus sores on the face, interview and record review revealed the sores/marks were consistent with oxygen mask straps. Records confirm the hospice agency was administering oxygen to R1 while R1 was in care at the facility. Additionally, per the interviews with relevant medical professionals, R1 was diagnosed with “senile ecchymosis” – increased fragility to the skin due to aging on the side of R1’s face. Based on interview and record review, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation at this time. Therefore, the allegation that “resident sustained multiple pressure injuries while in care” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Report continued on LIC 9099-C |