1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | From interviews, C1 stated staff do not make clients stay in their rooms. S1 stated clients are not forced to stay in their rooms. Other facility staff confirmed that clients are not forced to stay in their rooms. Staff #2 (S2) noted clients would only be advised to go to their rooms in the event of a dangerous behavioral episode or for COVID isolation. S2 also noted C1’s history of fabricating events that did not happen. From file review, there was a pattern of unsubstantiated allegations from C1 from July 2021 to October 2021. Based on interviews and file review, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Regarding the allegation “Residents are forced to sleep”, it was alleged S1 forced C1 and two other clients to go to sleep. From interviews, C1 and Client #2 (C2) stated they have not been forced to go to bed. S1 and S2 also confirmed that staff did not force clients to go to sleep. Based on interviews, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Regarding the allegation “Residents are not provided activities”, it was alleged S1 did not allow C1 to go outside to play. Additionally, C1’s time at church was limited. From interviews, S1 stated activities are provided to clients based on their preferences. C1 did attend church but had to leave early due to a behavioral episode. S2 stated C1 has refused activities which were offered and did not suggest their preferred activities. C1 told LPA they attended church with staff on 01/22/2023. C1 likes to play ball and watch baseball on the television. LPA observed C2 and Client #3 (C3) playing basketball outside with staff at 3:00 p.m. on 01/23/2023. Based on interviews and observations, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Regarding the allegation “Resident is not awarded privacy”, it was alleged staff listen in on C1’s phone calls. From interviews, C1 stated staff do not listen to their phone calls. S2, Staff #3 (S3), and the Administrator noted staff provide privacy during client phone calls. Most clients use the house phone in the living room, but C1 has their own phone in their room. Staff encourage clients to use the phone in their rooms. Based on interviews, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided. |