1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Division’s Investigations Branch (IB). The investigation consisted of interviews with R1’s family members, facility Executive Director, Health Services Director, Memory Care Director, two (2) Resident Coordinators, two (2) Medical Technician's, Hospice Nurse, two (2) Facility Care Providers, two (2) Private companions (hired by R1's family), Housekeeping, R1's records review - included but not limited to physicians report (signed and dated on 01/11//2019 - 04/14/21 and 10/21/22), resident care notes (from 04/29/21 to 10/06/22), 1st Hospice care plan (dated as of 10/22/2022), 2nd Hospice care plan (dated as of 10/10/22) and other relevant documentation. Investigator, Santiago, also subpoenaed R1’s Medical Records on 10/13/22 and reviewed on 12/23/22.
Allegation: "Resident sustained an unexplained injury in care."
The investigation findings revealed that R1 had been living at this facility, in a Memory Care Unit, since April 2021. Interview with R1’s family revealed that R1 continued to have multiple falls from 09/12/22 that resulted in bruising and skin tear. Review of medical records confirmed that on 09/12/22, the facility initiated emergency medical services and resident was later diagnosed with a nasal tip fracture after an unwitnessed fall that staff was unable to explain. In addition, on 10/08/2022, family brought R1 for a doctor’s visit due to unexplained bruising and confirmed that R1 sustained three rib fractures. Lastly, R1 continued to have multiple falls that resulted in bruising and skin tear until R1 moved out of the facility on 10/26/2022, due to hospitalization from another fall. Based on interviews and document review, during the course of the investigation, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the above allegation is Substantiated.
Allegation: "Resident sustained multiple falls due to lack of supervision."
Although the family brought on multiple companions for R1, they were not always available and were unsuccessful in preventing falls and reducing injuries. Facility was aware of the R1’s decline, yet interviews and records verified that there were no updated reappraisals or fall plan in place to reflect on managing the resident’s change of condition. Staff revealed inconsistent information on how often they checked on resident. Throughout the course of the resident’s decline, Executive Director advised the family that they don’t have the staffing to meet R1’s needs and suggested getting a one-on-one caregiver or placing R1 in another community more suitable for his/her needs. Although the Executive Director communicated with the family about moving R1, they admitted they were willing to let the family extend their notice, knowing the facility
Continue on LIC9099-C |