1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Regarding allegation: Staff did not provide adequate resident care or supervision to prevent frequent falls which resulted in hospitalization. It is alleged a resident has fallen 3 times and one of the falls resulted in a head injury. Interviews with residents revealed 7 out of 8 residents stated staff are quick to respond when they have a fall, staff update their needs and care plan as needed, provide the necessary assistance as well as check on the residents more often after a fall occurs until there are no concerns. 1 out of 8 residents refused to be interviewed. Interviews with staff revealed upon observing a resident fall staff respond by going to the resident, informed the Med-Tech on duty, Medtech evaluates the resident, calls emergency respond services if necessary. When a resident has an open wound injury because of a fall or hit their head emergency responder services are called and the residents are sent out to the hospital. Documents reviewed revealed Resident #1(R1)’s physician’s report dated: 8/18/25 notes R1 has a non-ambulatory status and does not have any motor impairments. Incident report dated: 2/8/26 notes R1 was found on the floor in the patio laying in their back and blood was noted from the back of the head. The facility contacted emergency services and R1 was taken to the hospital. Needs and Care plan dated 8/21/25 notes no falls for R1. Needs and Care plan dated: 08/21/25 notes an update on 2/14/26 as R1 being a fall risk and requiring partial assist. Interventions are to monitor R1 and assist with compliance of use of mechanical aides. Needs and Care plan dated: 08/21/25 notes updates on 4/22/26 and 6/27/26 to redirect and provide safety education to R1. There were no incident reports prior 02/08/26 to note falls for R1. Although R1 sustained a fall that resulted in an injury based on documents reviewed there was no history of falls prior to that incident. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the ED. |