1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | To investigate the allegation, LPA conducted a physical plant tour and requested documents at 10:45a.m., interviewed two (2) staff from 11:00a.m. to 12:00p.m. and three (3) out of five (5) residents. LPA was unable to interview R1. During the physical plant tour, LPA observed all residents were clean and well-groomed. A review of the Physician’s Report states resident needs assistance with all activities of daily living. A review of the hospice care plan states R1 is actively dying, has constipation issues, is at risk for skin breakdown, bed bound and reduced food intake. The care plan lists interventions such as ongoing assessment, hazard free environments and monitor effectiveness of current and new medications. A review of staff schedule shows there at least two (2) caregivers during the day shift and one (1) at night. LPA selected three (3) staff files for review. A review of selected facility files shows all staff have completed the required training. During interviews, Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2) stated residents are checked on every hour or more if needed. S2 explained that hospice nurse was present thirty (30) minutes prior to noticing the change in condition. S2 added hospice agency and responsible party were contacted and a nurse was dispatched same evening. S1 stated the condition cleared up by the following day. Regarding the April 25th dried blood incident, both S1 and S2 stated they could not identify it as blood and immediately contacted the hospice agency. They came the same day and cleaned it. During interviews, all residents stated they are checked on often and feel facility provides adequate care and supervision.
Based on interviews, observations and record review, there is not enough information to verify the allegation, therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
No health and safety hazards noted during the visit.
Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued. |