1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Facility staff did not follow client's care plan which resulted in financial lost. It was alleged staff did not follow C1’s treatment plan which resulted in C1's financial lost when purchasing items for multiple clients. To investigate the allegation, LPA attempted to interview three (3) clients and three (3) staff members. LPA attempted to interview C1, C2 and C3 but they no longer reside at the facility and could not be contacted. LPA’s interview with S1 revealed C1 had attended a community outing with two (2) other clients (C2, C3) and one (1) staff member (S3). S1 revealed the outing was approved for the movies but instead the clients “pivoted” to a non-approved outing to the mall resulting in C1 purchasing items for C2 and C3. S1 revealed due to the incident, S3 was spoken to where an investigation was conducted by the Human Resources department (HR) resulting in termination. LPA’s interview with S2 correlated S1’s interview. S2 revealed S3 should have stopped C1, and the outing should have been ended. S2 stated, “It is the responsibility of the staff to ensure they are not spending amongst their needs”. LPA attempted to interview S3, but they no longer work at the facility.
LPA conducted a record review of C1’s file. LPA’s record review of C1’s diagnosis revealed C1 to have a range of psychological health conditions including “impulsivity” which requires them to have, “…24-hour structure, therapeutic intervention, and monitoring to support stabilization and prevent further decompensation”. Further record review of C1’s “Receipt of Client Handbook and Orientation Guide” revealed one of the community guidelines to state, “Residents are not permitted to borrow money, lend money, or purchase gifts for residents or staff”.
Additionally, LPA’s record review of the Facility’s Program Design revealed, “It is the policy…clients who are capable of leaving the premise with or without supervision to do so, so long as…those clients are capable of managing their mental health…”. When questioned if C1 could leave the facility without staff supervision, both S1 and S2 denied their ability in doing so. LPA’s record review of C1’s Admission Agreement revealed C1, “…completed an assessment…and has been deemed appropriate for admission…” into the facility where they would be provided with, “…24-hour-a-day non-medical care and supervision…”. Further record review of C1’s treatment plan dated (4/06/2026) revealed them to have difficulty with, “…socialization and self-advocacy…” where interventions of self-regulation skills were notated.
Based on interviews and record review, there is enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED at this time. No other immediate health and safety issues observed during the day of the visit. Exit interview was conducted, appeal rights given and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator
|