1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | R1 is very aggressive and combative towards staff. LPA was unable to interview R1 during initial visit because R1 was taken to the hospital for evaluation. Return date was unknown at that time. LPA interviewed R2 during the initial visit, and R2 was unable to confirm if staff was aggressive towards R1. Moreover, R2 denied S1 ever being aggressive towards residents during the day of that interview.
Also during the initial investigation, LPA Cava made contact with R1's family, who cannot confirm if S1 had been aggressive towards R1. R1's family further stated R1 has a diagnosis that limits the ability to communicate and store memory. LPA did attempt to interview R1 over the telephone, but was not getting a response.
Today's investigation consisted of interviews with the administrator, Lala Soghomonyan, and staff Eva Vardanyan and Eva Matirosyan, who deny both allegations. Administrator adds that R1 had been aggressive towards staff since moving into facility. R1 did not stay too long in the facility. After being taken to the hospital for evaluation, R1 never returned. Interviews with five (5) of five residents could not corroborate with the allegations. These residents moved in after this complaint was made. When residents were asked if current staff have been aggressive towards them, all residents stated no.
Based on the information obtained, there wasn't enough evidence to probe that Facility staff slapped and kicked a resident. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Administrator advised, and a copy of this report issued. |