1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In regards to the allegations from the previous page, it was reported that Resident 1 (R1) was observed in a soiled diaper, and smelled of urine and feces. It appeared that R1's face had not been washed and there was food all over R1's clothes. In addition, R1 was not properly clothed as R1 was lying under a sheet with only a diaper on. There were no witneses provided to corroborate with these allegations. During the initial ten (10) day visit made by LPA Cava, LPA had the opportunity to interview R1, who had no complaints or concerns to report regarding the facility. R1 stated their needs are met. Staff assists with bathing, going to the bathroom for toileting needs, getting in and out of bed, going on and off their wheelchair, and change of clothes. R1 gave no indication of neglect, and was satisfied with needs provided. During the interiew, LPA observed R1 to be appropriately cared for. Today, LPA conducted interviews with administrator and staff, who both deny the allegation of neglecting R1 or any other of the residents in care. LPA also interviewed three (3) of three residents between 9:30am to 10:30am. Interviews made with these residents do not corroborate with these allegations. LPA conducted a record review of R1's Medical Assessment, Appraisals, and Functional Capabilities. These records do confirm that R1 require assistance with bathing, grooming and toileting needs.
Although there is information that reveal R1 requires some assistance with her Activities of Daily Living (ADL), there is insufficient evidence to prove that Staff do not ensure that resident's incontinence needs are met, Staff did not assist resident with bathing, and Staff did not assist resident with grooming. Therefore, allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Facility smelled malodorous:
In regards to the allegation, it was reported that facility and R1's room smelled of urine and feces during a visit to the home on or around 11/05/25. No witnesses were provided to confirm the allegation. During LPA's ten day visit, made on 11/13/25, a physical plant inspection was made. LPA did not notice a smell of urine and feces during that visit. Interviews with administrator, staff and residents made shared no complaints or concerns, denying the facility smelled malodorous. LPA conducted another physical plant inspection today, 03/13/26, and did not notice facility smelling of urine or feces. Interviews with the three residents, who were present during this visit, had no complaints regarding the physical plant ever smelling malodorous. Based on the information obtained, there was not enough evidence to confirm the above allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. |