1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from LIC9099) LPA requested and obtained copies of the following documents: Register of Facility Residents (LIC 9020), Personnel Report (LIC 500), Resident #1's (R1's) admission agreement, Physician's Report (LIC602), Appraisal Needs and Services, Hospice documentation, 30 day eviction notice, and Unusual Incident Reports regarding R1. LPA Rios also interviewed R1's responsible party. LPA obtained copies of R1's after summary visit and wound consult from their time in the hospital.
The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation: Staff unlawfully evicted a resident. It was alleged that R1 was not permitted to return to the facility after being cleared for discharge. Instead, the facility issued R1's responsible party a 30 day notice. LPA's review of the 30 day notice provided to R1's responsible party dated 3/11/2026 revealed it is not in compliance with Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, Article 4, Subsection 87224 Eviction Procedures. The eviction notice is missing information about resources available to assist in identifying alternative housing and care options, a statement informing residents of their right to file a complaint with the licensing agency, and the an exact statement as specified in Health and Safety Code Section 1569.683(a)(4). LPA's interview with the administrator revealed that the purpose of issuing the notice was to document the actions of R1’s responsible party related to the incident on 03/10/2026, and to inform the responsible party of the conditions that must be met before R1 could be readmitted so that facility may be in compliance with regulations. The facility may have provided a separate notice regrading their conditions for readmittance or conducted a re appraisal to update R1's care plan so that the facility may determine whether they would be able to meet R1's needs or not. Instead the facility provided a 30 day notice for breaking house rules.
Based on LPAs observations, interviews and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated.
(Continue to LIC9099-C) Page 2 of 3 |