1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Licensee failed to be in the required ratio
It was alleged that the facility failed to maintain the required staffing ratios. The investigation revealed that there needs to be two coaches (ie. non-clinical staff) on each shift, which would indicate a 1:3 staff to client ratio at all times. Staff interviews revealed that when staff called off, other staff were asked to cover or work double shifts. If staff commented that there was an understaffing issue, it was because the same staff were being asked to work overtime, which may indicate that the facility needs more staff. Staff also noted that managers from the operations team would step in and fill a shift if need be. However, the LPA reviewed timecards from the period of Monday 4/4/2022 – Sunday 4/10/2022. Per the review, the LPA discovered there was only one non-clinical staff person working the overnight shift on 4/4/2022, one non-clinical staff person working the overnight shift on 4/8/2022, and one non-clinical staff person working the morning shift on 4/9/2022. Based on the information obtained, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the licensee failed to be in the required staffing ratio. This allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time.
Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 9099-D):
Exit interview conducted, today's reports and appeal rights were reviewed and issued.
|