1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation 1: the first allegation stated that staff does not abide court orders. During the investigation, it was revealed that there are court documents limiting the access to the child care facility and Child 1 for Parent 1. Parent 1 had another child (Child 2) enrolled in the child care facility that was not under court documents limiting their access to the facility or to Child 2. There is no supporting evidence that Parent 1 had access to Child 1 while on the premises of the facility nor that staff of the facility provided access to Child 1 for Parent 1. After reviewing all the relevant information obtained, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to support the allegation. LPA provided technical assistance to the management staff and Licensee regarding processing court documents and abiding the stipulations of the court orders.
After observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that there was insufficient evidence that the facility’s staff was not abiding the court orders. The allegations could not be corroborated with the evidence found during the investigation. Therefore, the allegations have been found unsubstantiated. Although, the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the facility operated in violation of policy in this circumstance.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the Director along with the Notice of Site Visit and Appeal Rights.
|