1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation 3: The third allegation states that staff allowed a child in care to be picked up by an unauthorized adult. During the investigation, the LPA found that there was a child in care that has a court order on file restraining the non-custodial parent; however, the court order document has been altered and the original information has been covered and is illegible. The LPA inquired if an unaltered copy had been requested of the custodial parent and they stated there was an attempt made to get an unaltered copy; however, it was never provided by the parent. The advocates were instructed by management to allow the child to be picked up by the non-custodial parent with the restraining order despite the court order that could order against it but the center did not ensure the safety of the child by acquiring an unaltered copy. This is a Type B citation, see the LIC 9099D for the details.
Based on information obtained, observations, and interviews with relevant complaint parties, the Allegation is deemed substantiated for allegations 1, 2, and 3; as a result, Type B citations will be issued for all three allegations. A finding of substantiated means that allegations were valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met.
An exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report read and provided to the Center Director, and the Notice of Site Visit and Appeal Rights was explained and given to the Center Director.
|