1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (S1-S5) has verified that (R1) requires full assistance due to (R1's) health condition and non-ambulatory status and has had multiple falls. However, they do not agree that multiple falls have occurred with (R1) because of staff neglect. Rather, it is understood that, while care is available, (R1) often prefers to act independently and chooses not to follow the care directives provided. (S1-S3) reported that (R1) experienced several falls; however, in each incident, (R1) did not suffer any serious injuries and refused medical care at the hospital afterward. (S1-S3) reported that medical assessments are performed each time of a fall incident, but no reappraisal is performed. A fall prevention plan has been implemented to enhance (R1's) safety. Key measures have been implemented to ensure (R1's) safety and comfort. The room is kept clutter-free, and frequently used items are stored at waist height to prevent overreaching or bending. Additionally, half bed rails have been installed for extra support, and safety signs have been posted. An Individual Service Plan and a Resident Assessment for (R1) was conducted on January 8, 2026, with contributions from both the medical provider and family representatives which includes prevention of frequent falls. (S4-S5) verified completion of mandated staff training including fall prevention, proper positioning, back injury prevention, hoyer lift usability, and timely response to call lights.
On February 04, 2026, between 12:03 PM and 12:20 PM, the Department interviewed witness identified as Witness #1 (W1). (W1), who has a close relationship with (R1), asserts that (W1) is unable to confirm the claim. (W1) stated that while it is true (R1) has experienced multiple falls, it is unclear whether these incidents are the result of staff negligence or a lack of care. (W1) believes that (R1) is receiving adequate care, but (R1) prefers to be independent and can become impatient when waiting for assistance. (W1) is uncertain whether the emergency call system is not being used effectively or if the staff are responding promptly. Additionally, (W1) confirmed that (R1) has an unsteady gait due to health conditions. Consequently, care staff may mistakenly think that (R1) has fallen when, in fact, (R1) may be positioning thyself on the ground for support without having sustained a fall.
On February 4, 2026, an inspection was conducted in room #129, which is a shared space. The room was found to comply with all preventive measures, including the installation of half-bed rails, a clutter-free environment, and the positioning of frequently used items at waist height. Additionally, safety signs, a grabber tool, and an operational emergency call system were present.
During the inspection, the Department also tested the emergency call systems in rooms #123, #124, #128, #129, and #130, confirming that all systems were in good working order. Care staff demonstrated timely responsiveness, addressing calls within one to two minutes.
(Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099--C)
|