1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following: LPA attempted to interview clients, all four (4) clients interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. All four (4) staff interviewed denied the allegation. Staff interviews revealed that staff was not instructed and did not pour expired milk to different container. Per physical plant, LPA checked the food inventory on milk and it was current and looked fine. Therefore, facility is not storing expired milk.
In regard to allegation of “staff are preparing meals for residents with food that was removed from trash bins,” it was alleged that facility staff re-collected the canned foods from trash and took them back to cook to clients. The investigation revealed the following: LPA attempted to interview clients, all four (4) clients interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. All four (4) staff interviewed denied the allegation. Staff interviews revealed staff did not take the canned food from trash and cook to serve clients. During the visit, LPA toured the kitchen, checked canned food, found none expired and did not see any canned food in trash can being taken back to cook. Therefore, facility did not have prepare meals to clients with food from trash bins.
In regard to allegation of “facility is not meeting the dietary needs of a resident in care,” it was alleged that no diabetic snacks available for diabetic client. The investigation revealed the following: LPA attempted to interview clients, all four (4) clients interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. All four (4) staff interviewed denied the allegation. Staff interview revealed that snacks for diabetic clients were available and being given to diabetic client. During the visit, LPA checked food supply and observed low sugar snack packs, string cheese and sugar free puddings/jello were in stock. Therefore, facility had provided snacks to client for client’s dietary needs.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8.
An exit interview was conducted with Omar, assisted administrator. A hard copy of this report was provided. |