1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ***This report serves as an amendment and supersedes the original complaint investigation report created on 02/27/24. The findings remain as unsubstantiated. ***
In regards of facility staff did not ensure resident had clean linens, it was alleged that staff did not change client’s bed sheet after soiled. LPA attempted but unsuccessful to interview clients from client#1 (C1) to client#3 (C3). Per staff interviews, all four (4) staff who were interviewed denied the allegation. Staff stated they would change clients’ bedsheet / linens whenever it got soiled. Per LPA’s observation, clients’ beds were neat, and bedsheets were clean. Thus, clients had clean linens and bed sheets for use while in care.
In regards of facility staff did not provide hygiene care to resident, it was alleged staff did not clean client when client had bloody nose. LPA attempted but unsuccessful to interview from client#1 (C1) to client#3 (C3). Per staff interviews, all four (4) staff who were interviewed denied the allegation. Per record review, the client who had bloody nose was on one to one care at the facility. Staff was always next to that client. Per LPA’s observation, all clients were clean and neat. Thus, the facility had provided hygiene care to clients.
In regards of facility failed to provide residents with adequate food service, it was alleged that facility staff provide clients with the old food from restaurant and did not have fresh fruit. LPA attempted but unsuccessful to interview from client#1 (C1) to client#3 (C3). Per staff interviews, all four (4) staff who were interviewed denied the allegation. Staff stated they cooked fresh on every meal. Per record review, administrator made grocery shopping weekly. Per LPA’s observation, the facility had more than two days non-perishable food and seven days of perishable food. Thus, clients had adequate food service while in care.
Based on the information obtained during the investigation, interviews with staff, residents, review of resident files and LPA's observation, the investigation did not reveal any evidence to support the allegations mentioned above.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with interim administrator, Omar. The findings were discussed. A copy this report was provided to Omar at time of visit. |