1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff does not allow resident to visit at the facility
It was alleged that staff refused to allow a client to have visitors at the facility. In interviews, the administrator and staff 1-3 (S1-S3) admitted that they did not allow C3 to have a visitor (F1) at the facility because the visitor refused to show the vaccination card and began yelling and using profanity when asked to show the vaccination card. Staff stated that F1 eventually showed his vaccination card but was later asked not to return to the facility due to the incident. F1 stated that on 9/11/21, F1-F2 came to visit C3 at the facility and had called ahead of time to arrange an outing with C3. F1 stated that S3 asked to see their vaccination cards and F1 declined to show the card because F1 was told that vaccination cards are not required if a client was going on an outing with a visitor. F2 also stated that they had come to the facility to take C3 on an outing and that S3 asked to see their vaccination cards. F1-F2 stated that after the visit, C3 informed them that clients were not supposed to go out on outings with visitors and that they were not allowed to visit at the facility anymore due to the incident that occurred. F1 stated that F1 attempted to visit on another occasion on 11/5/21 and was denied being able to visit or see C3 outside of the facility. C1-C2 stated that they are allowed to have visitors at the facility, while C3 stated that F1-F2 are not allowed to visit the facility because they are causing problems. RP1 stated that the visitor was not allowed to visit at the facility because they were disrespectful to staff and refused to show the vaccination card. P1, staff member at the placement agency, was made aware of the situation and stated that staff refused visitation due to the visitor using profanity and not following the rules to show the vaccination card. S2, assistant administrator, stated that the visitor is allowed to visit C3 at an outside location but will not be allowed on the property. The admissions agreement provided did not mention the facility's visitation policy.
Based on LPA’s interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 6, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the house manager along with the Appeals Rights. |