1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation was conducted by the licensing agency's Investigation Bureau (IB) and was assigned to Investigator, Laura Garcia. IB's investigation consisted of the following: Interviews were conducted with Staff#1-3 (S1-S3), Witness# 1-2 (W1-W2), and Hospice Staff#1-2 (H1-H2), and hospital records for Resident#1 (R1) were obtained. IB was unable to interview R1 due to R1's cognitive impairment and being non-verbal.
IB's investigation revealed the following:
Regarding allegation: Staff neglect led to resident sustaining severe burns while in care which resulted in hospitalization.
It is alleged that on 11/29/23, R1 was taken to the hospital with severe burns/blisters to R1's face, back, arms and hands, and was reported by facility staff it was possibly due to a chemical reaction. Per IB's interviews conducted, (3) of (3) staff denied neglect/lack of care and supervision to R1, which resulted in R1 sustaining severe burns/blisters. Per staff, on 11/29/23, H2 was providing R1 with a shower. During the shower, H2 noticed R1's skin beginning to redden and immediately notified S3 of it. S3 went to check on R1 and observed the reddening/irritation and notified S1 of the incident. S1 then notified R1's responsible party of the incident and and medical attention was sought for R1 and R1 was taken to the hospital for treatment. IB attempted to interview R1 but was unable to due to R1's cognitive impairment and being non-verbal. Per interviews conducted, (2) of (2) witnesses denied staff being neglectful or unable to provide adequate care and supervision to residents in care W1 denied facility staff being responsible for R1's burns sustained. Per interview with W1, H2 was the only individual responsible for providing showers to R1. W1 stated to have been notified immediately of the incident occurred on 11/29/23, by the facility. Per hospital records obtained, IB discovered that on 11/29/23, R1 was brought to the hospital and presented with blistering wounds on R1's face, back, and hands. The medical decision was stated to be consistent with scalding hot burns. Per IB's interview conducted with H2, H2 stated to be the only individual responsible for providing R1 with showers. H2 admitted that on the noted date, H2 came to the facility at about 8:30AM to give R1 a shower. H2 tested the water prior to showering R1 and felt it was at a comfortable temperature. While showering R1, H2 immediately noticed that R1's skin began to redden/blister and immediately notified S3 of it and left the facility. Facility staff were not responsible for R1's showers. Therefore, this allegation is Unsubstantiated.
LPA Maldonado agrees with IB's investigation and findings.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and Health & Safety Code, no deficiencies were observed or cited during the visit.
Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. |