1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In regard of staff member did not treat residents with dignity and respect, it was alleged staff mistreated and belittled clients. Per client interviews, one (1) out of five (5) clients stated staff did not treat client with respect. Four (4) out of five (5) clients could not corroborate the allegation. Client interviews revealed staff did not speak inappropriately or mistreat clients. All staff denied the allegation. Staff interview revealed staff treated clients with respect and dignity. In addition, LPA observed that staff were nice to clients and did not belittle or disrespect clients during the time of visit. Therefore, there was not preponderance of evidence to prove staff failed to treat clients with dignity and respect.
In regard of facility has an infestation of cockroaches and rats, it was alleged the facility had an infestation of rats and cockroaches. Per client interviews, one (1) out of five (5) clients stated facility had an infestation of cockroaches and rats. Four (4) out of five (5) clients could not corroborate the allegation. Client interview revealed that the facility did not observe to have pest issues. Per staff interviews, all staff denied the allegation. Staff interview revealed the facility was in contract with pest control company and the company did not indicate the facility had pest issues. Per LPA observation, LPA did not observe dead cockroaches or rats at the facility or trace of pest issues. Thus, the facility did not observe to have an infestation.
In regard of staff did not provide adequate food service, it was alleged staff did not provide food or snacks to clients and did not allow clients to cook for themselves. Per client interviews, one (1) out of five (5) clients stated the facility did not provide adequate food to client. Four (4) out of five (5) clients could not corroborate the allegation. Client interview revealed that the facility had provided clients with food and snacks between meals. Clients chose not to cook for themselves since meals and food were provided. Per staff interviews, all two (2) out of two (2) staff denied the allegation. Staff interview revealed that staff provide three meals daily and snacks, such as fruit and breads to clients during the day. LPA conducted physical plant and reviewed food supplies. LPA observed snacks and beverages, such as cookies, crackers, soda, coffee, fruit, fruit juice, and milk. There were more than 2 days of perishable and 7 days of nonperishable food supplies at the facility. Therefore, snacks were provided to clients with adequate food services.
In regard of staff did not provide the necessary supplies for residents' personal care, it was alleged staff did not provide toilet paper, shampoo, or soap to clients to use. Per client interviews, one (1) out of five (5) clients corroborated the allegation. Four (4) out of five (5) clients could not corroborate the allegation. Client interview revealed that facility provided clients with toilet papers / soaps and had no restriction on using them. Clients could have their personal preference of hygiene supplies; thus, they used their own supplies.
(-continued in LIC 9099 C-) |