1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Allegation - Staff did not respond to a resident’s call pendant timely. Administrator and Staff stated that staff would typically respond to resident’s call pendant between 5 – 10 minutes. When a resident presses the pendant, it pages the caregivers and they can see which room is calling along with the name of resident. Once the caregiver tends to the resident, he/she will reset the pendant. Although Staff reported that they usually respond right away, they also noted that sometimes they can take as long as 30 minutes to respond to the resident due to staff assisting another resident. 5 out of the 8 residents interviewed stated that it takes staff sometimes more than 15 minutes and as long as 30 minutes to respond. Some also feel that the facility has a shortage of caregivers.
Allegation – Poor quality of food being served to residents. Administrator Holder stated that she is not aware of any residents complaining about the quality of the food being served. LPA obtained the food menu and observed a variety of food listed. Staff stated that residents can choose either an American or Asian meal. They also have other alternatives available for lunch and dinner. Per Staff interviewed, 2 of them have heard residents complaining about the food being cold or meat is tough. Interviews with 4 out of the 8 residents indicated that the food sometimes tasted spoiled, meat was tough to chew, or vegetables were still cold.
Allegation - Resident eloped from the facility. Administrator Holder admitted that one of the residents had eloped from the facility back in January or February of 2020. Resident was discovered missing when the MedTech went to pass out medication to the resident. The resident was found and brought back to the community. Administrator stated at that time the resident was unable to leave the facility unassisted as indicated on the Physician’s Report. Another staff also confirmed that the resident had eloped from the facility without supervision. Per Administrator, the front desk has a list of residents who cannot leave the facility unsupervised and they try their best to monitor who arrives and leaves.
Based on LPA interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted and Plan of Corrections were reviewed and developed with the Administrator, Tracey Holder. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and left with Administrator whose signature on this form confirm receipt of these documents. |