1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding Allegation #1: this investigation revealed based on interviews conducted (between 9:00 a.m. to 10:25 a.m.) of facility staff and residents, the majority had not observed facility staff mistreat Resident #1 or address any name calling (racist) towards the resident. It was (also) agreed that facility staff treats all residents with dignity and respect. It was not witnessed by the majority of staff and residents that (former) Administrator Michael Mendoza would discuss politics or make derrogatory statements towards Resident #1 or staff and other residents.
Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted and records reviewed, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation of PERSONAL RIGHTS: Staff didn't treat resident with dignity and respect is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding Allegation #2: this investigation revealed based on interviews conducted (between 9:00 a.m. to 10:25 a.m.) of facility staff and residents, the majority had not observed a facility staff member behaving inappropriately while on the job and making derrogatory comments towards Resident #1, staff or other residents. A review of the facility's training records documented that the facility provided facility staff with training on the topic: "Personal Rights of Residents in Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly" on 12/02/2020, 10/18/21, and 06/15/22.
Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted and records reviewed, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation of OTHER: Staff member was impaired while on the job is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview has been conducted and a copy of the Complaint Report was provided to Administrator, Pamela Ogot, MBA..
|