1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ran into the dining room and grabbed a bottle of habanero sauce and shook it. Per S1, she noticed that C1, had drops of salsa on his shirt and removed C1’s shirt to rinse it out. S1 stated that she observed C1 rubbing the eye. S1 stated she asked C1 if his eye was bothering him and C1 stated yes. S1 stated that she took C1 into the bathroom to rinse out his eye with water. Per S1, C1’s eye was not swollen or red at the moment but did start to get swollen and red somewhat bruised throughout the day. Per S1, the incident occurred at approximately 2:30pm and C1 was picked up at 4:30pm. LPA asked S1 how long it took for her to realize C1’s eye was bothering him. Per S1, she noticed immediately. Per S3, she only brought C1 into the dining room and did not observe the incident occur. Per S2, she did not observe the incident occur as the children were still napping.
Based on interviews conducted, the above allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANITAED. Based on interviews conducted with staff, children and parents, the above allegations are Unsubstantiated. There is not enough evidence or witnesses to substantiate, therefore, allegations are rendered Unsubstantiated at this time. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged allegations occurred. At this time LPA is unable to make a determination that any violations occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with licensee, Angelica Rodriguez and a copy of this report, Notice of Site visit and Appeal Rights were provided on this day, 12/05/2023. |