1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Pertaining to the allegation of Staff did not supervise daycare child, interviews with daycare staff determined that an incident occurred at the facility where day care Staff #6 left two (2) day care children eating alone in the Infant room while Staff #6 left to the preschool room.
Regarding to the allegation of Child given an unsafe food item, interviews conducted with daycare staff determined that an incident occurred at the facility where day care Staff #6 gave day care child baby carrots belonging to Staff #6. Child gave another child carrot then Staff #6 walked away from children. In addition, Staff #6 disclosed observing infant child in questioned eating baby carrot before walking away to another room.
Referring to the allegation of Staff did not report child’s allergic reaction, interviews conducted with day care staff reveal that an incident occurred at the facility where the infant child in question had an allergic reaction and staff did not report child’s reaction to parent. Staff #6 disclosed observing hives on the neck and shoulder of the infant child in question after the child had an allergic reaction to food and Staff #6 did not immediately notify child’s parent.
Based on LPAs interviews which were conducted, and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, the following deficiencies are being cited (see attached LIC 9099D). REPORT CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE 2 OF 3.
|