1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation regarding- staff did not prevent day care child from being threatened by another child in care. LPA interviewed S1 and S2, who disclosed that C2 has behavioral issues. Per S1 and S2, facility has been working with C2 and C2s parents. S1 stated that there have been parent meetings, redirection, and have offered 1 on 1. C2 did not have any improvements. On 07/11/23, the facility had a field trip where C1 and C2 joined and were in the same group. During the field trip, S1 heard C2 make a threat to C1. According to S1, S1 was close enough to hear C2 threatening C1. S1 asked C1 what C2 had said and C1 informed S1 that C2 made a verbal threat. S1 asked C2 if a threat was made towards C1 to which C2 denied making any threats. According to S2, after the field trip there was a meeting held between S1, S2, C1, and C2. S1 and S2 discussed what happened in the field trip and reinforced that making threats to others is not appropriate. S2 asked C2 if a threat was made to C1 and C2 stated “yes, I did say that.” According to S1, C2 has been known to bully other day care children and has made threats of “beating them up” and “tortures kids and the staff.” LPA interviewed C1, who corroborated that C2 made a threat during the field trip. Per S1, C2’s services were terminated on 07/12/23.
Allegation regarding - staff did not notify day care child's authorized representative of incident in a timely manner. According to S2, parents are notified of any incidents that may have occurred at the facility on a case by case. Per S2, parents receive incident reports if there are any head injuries, children have been bitten, or scratched. Per S1, S1 wanted to meet with parents of C1 and C2 the following day (07/12/23) to discuss what transpired during the field trip that took place on 07/11/23. According to S1, RP was not notified of the threat made to C1 during pick up, however, P2 was notified during pick up of C2’s threat to C1. C1 disclosed to RP that C2 made a threat during the field trip. Per S1, RP was later called to “explain the situation.” S1 and S2, confirmed that a meeting was held between S1 and RP on 07/12/23. According to RP, “facility was able to resolve this incident” and is “satisfied with the outcome.” LPA advised that staff report serious threats to parents upon pick up. The incident was self-reported to the department.
Based on LPA observations and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, the following deficiency are being cited (see attached 9099D).
Page 2 of 3 |