1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | scratching C1 on the neck, leaving a mark.
According to complainant, When C1 was picked up on 7/26/2021 complainant was given in incident report stating that C1 was in a disagreement with another child and C1 was scratched. Complainant disclosed that incident report stated that ice was applied. Complainant disclosed that when C1 showed complainant scratched it looked like C1 was attacked. Per complainant incident happened at 3:30 pm and nobody called to inform about the incident.
LPA conducted interviews with S1, S2, and S4. S1 disclosed that C1 was scratched by another child when C1 wanted a car that the other child was using. C1 pushed C2 and C2 scratched C1. Per S1, S2 was called and S2 took C1 to the office to clean and ice the area. S2 and S4 disclosed that they did not see incident but helped child with ice and Neosporin.
Staff interviewed stated that incident reports are written, and teachers speak to parents at the end of the day, but parents are not called when an incident happens unless it is an emergency. However, S4 disclosed that parents are usually called and since the scratched incident happened towards the end of the day parents were not called. Staff disclosed that C2 has known aggressive behavior.
Interviews conducted found that C1 was scratched by another child and C1’s parent was not called when the incident happened. LPA interviewed parents and children and no disclosures about this specific allegation were made. It is evident that C1 neck was injured while in care and that C1’s parent was not informed of the injury until C1 was picked up.
Regarding allegation #2, facility did not follow proper termination process in admissions agreement- LPA conducted interviews with complainant and staff, LPA reviewed documentation as well. Complainant stated that after incident happened an email was sent to the school stating the date C1 would return to school. Complainant received an email back stating that C1 was disenrolled from the facility. Per complainant, no previous written noticed was given as stated in enrollment package.
LPA conducted interview with S1 who disclosed they were not sure of the disenrolling process- S1 disclosed that C1 was the last child to be disenrolled, and was aware that C1’s mother stated child was not coming back.
-----------------------------------------------------------------Pg. 2 of 3 -----------------------------------------------------------------
|