1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | On December 16, 2025, at 12:40pm Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dayna Chambers conducted an unannounced complaint inspection for the purpose of delivering the finding for the above allegation. Upon arrival, LPA observed 2 children and 2 staff and licensee in care. During the investigation, LPA Chambers conducted interviews with reporting party, licensee, staff, and parents, reviewed records, and made observations regarding the above allegations. The complaint alleges that Licensee left child in a soiled diaper for an excessive amount of time. Although allegations were made, evidence obtained did not reveal any witnesses or supporting evidence and interviews conducted did not corroborate the allegations. Staff denied the allegation. LPA interviewed 2 parents and the parents interviewed did not disclose any concerns. Based on the information obtained, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that personal rights were violated.The allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The allegations are determined to be Unsubstantiated. Appeal rights were provided and discussed with the facility representative. A Notice of Site Visit (LIC 9213) was given and must remain posted for 30 days.
Exit interview was conducted and report was reviewed with Licensee Angelica Jimenez.
|