1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Per S1-S2, the staff member who gave C1 is no longer employed at the facility. Per S2, the day of the incident there was carelessness when the donuts were being passed out. Per S1-S2, C1 did not have an allergic reaction at the facility, C1 was taken to seek medical attention by C1's parents after pick up. S1-S2 stated there is an allergy list for children who have allergies. P1 stated their child does have medication at the facility and stated the facility has always been very cautious with allergies. Per P1, there has never been an incident where the child was given any food they are allergic to.
Based on interviews conducted, C1 was given a donut at the facility and facility staff admitted that they knew C1 has a peanut and egg allergy. The above allegation is deemed SUBSTANTIATED. A finding of Substantiated means that the preponderance of evidence standard has been met.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to Office Administrator, Sara Garrido. A Notice of Site Visit was provided. |