1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding allegation that licensee withheld water, children were observed to have their own bottles of water or milk and a large case of water for children accessible to school age children. Children were observed drinking water without hindrance. Interviews support that punishment is not applied via withholding of water. Regarding allegation of licensee poured water on day care child. No verification could be made via interview, or observation. Interviews reflect that no water play is done outside, and children are not punished by pouring water on their heads. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
No deficiencies will be cited today 12/5/24.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days.
Exit interview was conducted with Francis Tomas, including, but not limited to Provider Rights, Appeal Procedures and Agencies Consultative Role.
Page 2 of 2
|