1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | for several minutes. I witnessed a child going toward their school when an adult ran after him, while another individual in front was able to pick up the child and handed them to a teacher inside the yard.” As well as the Co-Complainant stated, “On April 29, 2025, around 10 AM, I observed a two-year-old male child walking and wandering outside of the facility for approximately five minutes. A teacher immediately opened the gate and brought the child back inside. I was also informed that the director did not want to report this incident to licensing.” LPA Perry was unable to contact the R.P. as well as unable to contact the co-complainant due to being anonymous.
Interviews with facility staff confirmed that Child #1 did exit the facility’s preschool yard unsupervised. Staff #3 and Staff #4, who were assigned to supervise that area during outdoor time, stated they did not observe the child leaving. It wasn’t until Staff #5, who was located in the infant yard saw child #1 on the sidewalk that the situation became known. Staff#2 stated that while they were in their class, one of their students pointed outside the window indicating that they saw a child outside of the facility. Staff #2 stated that while they did see a child come in and out of their view due to obstructions, outside of the facility premises they did not recognize the child of being one of their children until they peeked outside the classroom door and heard S#3 scream, when they noticed and realized it was C#1. Staff #5 reacted immediately from the infant yard, dropping the facility iPad (timestamp at 10:16 AM) and retrieving the child. Staff #5 described the child as appearing sad, upset, and at risk of stepping off the sidewalk. The child was returned unharmed to Staff #3 and Staff #4 inside the preschool yard. Staff #1 acknowledged that the incident did happen and was not reported to the Department. S#1 stated that an internal review was conducted and concluded that staff maintained supervision. However, after review of those documents, no disclosures by staff stated that they witnessed the child leaving the yard until after the fact.
Parent interviews made no disclosures pertaining to the above allegation. All parents disclosed that they have no issues with the facility and are very satisfied with the facility. No parent concerns regarding supervision or safety.
During the LPA’s inspection, it was determined that the child #1 exited through the emergency exit door in the preschool yard. Which has an alarm, and when C#1 exited it did not go off. It was stated that that day the alarm was not functioning properly. A yarn had been temporarily tied to the door following the incident, and staff confirmed that they installed a metal bar to block access to the door latch as a corrective measure. The child’s scheduled outdoor playtime was from 9:30 AM to 10:30 AM. The child was observed outside in the play yard from 10:08am-10:38 AM, and the exact duration of time the child was unsupervised outside of the facility could not be confirmed. According to interviews |