| *This is an amended report created by LPA P. Ochoa*
The home that is in the rear part of the property is also a licensed large family childcare home (FCCH). LPA P. Ochoa interviewed Staff 1 (S1) and Adult 1(A1). LPA did observe a large banner located on the outside gate of the property promoting Angelica’s Daycare with both licensing numbers for each FCCH. LPA confirmed that both FCCH advertise their business through a website and social media which is managed by S1. Per S1 they were not aware that they were required to display their license number on online publications. LPA did identify that the website and social media account did not document any license number or identification that there are two FCCH’s on the property. LPA P. Ochoa interviewed Parent 1 (P1) – Parent 3 (P3). P1 – P3 all disclosed that they are happy with the care and have had a great experience at the facility. LPA P. Ochoa interviewed Child 1(C1) – Child 4 (C4). All children expressed that they enjoy their time at the FCC.
LPA can confirm that both facilities do advertise as Angelica’s Daycare. On 4/08/26, LPA observed Angelica’s Daycare’s website and social media account and LPA did not observe any license number posted. LPA explained to licensee they are required to list their license number on all advertisements to ensure that title 22 regulations are met.
Based on interviews conducted and observations, the above allegation is deemed SUBSTANTIATED. A finding of Substantiated means that the preponderance of evidence standard has been met.
Based on the LPAs observations and record review, the following deficiencies listed on the attached LIC 809D (deficiency page) are being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 22. Deficiencies that are being cited need to be cleared to protect the children’s health and safety.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the licensee, Tanya Garcia.
Page 2 of 2
|