1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During an interview, Staff#1 stated she has never seen the food from the facility being spoiled or unhealthy when she had to serve an infant any food from the facility. The complaint also alleged that the infant teacher Staff#2 arrived at around 10AM and any children that arrived prior was being supervised along with children from the preschool license. The Director stated that any infants that arrived before Staff#2 were cared for by a qualified staff member and were not commingled with older children.
During the investigation LPA Lee attempted to contact the parent of Child#1 but was unable to do so. It is possible that during the 1 day Child#1 attended the facility, the Child was cared for by another staff member before Staff#2 arrived that day, was provided meals and snacks from the facility, and had a soiled diaper during pick up time. However, there was not enough evidence to determine if the child was not care for properly, fed food that was not appropriate, and was not changed in a timely manner.
Based on the evidence collected during the investigation, the allegations that Staff did not provide proper care for day care child, fed food not of quality, and left day care child in soiled clothing for extended amount of time may be valid. However, there is not enough preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore at this time the above allegations are found to be unsubstantiated.
The notice of site inspection must remain posted for a period of 30 days during hours operation. Failure to maintain posting will result in a civil penalty of $100.00 dollars.
Exit interview conducted with Director Esther Choe. Appeal rights discussed and explained. |