1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on interviews that were conducted with five parents, no disclosures were made. They did not observe marks on their children body and children did not have any issue with potty training or bathrooming.
Based on interviews that were conducted with four staff, they did not observe marks on children’s body and they did not observe a staff member to pinch a children at any time.
Based on an interview that was conducted with staff#1, child#1 observed to have dry diaper all morning. Staff change children’s diapers every two hours. Per staff#1, child#1 was observed to have accidents while napping and get wet. Per staff#1, at that point she reached out to parent#1 and informed about the child#1 incident. Also, child#1 had issue with constipation. Per staff#1, parent#1 asked staff#1 to communicate with when child#1 had #2 at school. Per staff#1, child#1 was fine when started school, once parent#1 started potty training at home child#1 started holding pee. Per staff#1, parent#1 did not say anything until staff#1 brought up to parent#1 that child#1 is dry all day and having accidents when child#1 is napping.
Per staff#1 and staff#3, chid#1 was getting Occupational Therapy at home but do not know why.
The allegations may have happened or are valid, but there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. The evidence scale is equal meaning the weight of convincing evidence to prove something happened is equal to and has just as much convincing weight that it did not happen.
The Notice of Site Visit (LIC 9213) was given and must remain posted for 30 days.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the Bhagya Fernandro, Administrator.
REPORT END 2 of 2 |