1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The allegations comes from a single incident in the morning when the co-Licensee was transporting Child#1 and the sibling, who were brought to the family child care home by their parent, to their school from the family child care home. The reporting party alleges that Child#1 was handled in a rough manner when they were dragged towards the vehicle by the co-Licensee because they were resisting being taken to school. The Licensees stated that although Child#1 did resist trying to be taken to school, the child walked to the vehicle without any physical contact and was picked up and placed in the vehicle by the co-licensee in an appropriate manner. Although it is possible that during this incident Child#1 was handled in a rough manner while being placed in the vehicle, there is not enough evidence to substantiate this allegation.
Based on the evidence collected during the investigation, the allegations that provider handled day care child in a rough manner may be valid. However, there is not enough preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore at this time the above allegations are found to be unsubstantiated.
The notice of site inspection must remain posted for a period of 30 days during hours operation. Failure to maintain posting will result in a civil penalty of $100.00 dollars.
Exit interview conducted with Licensees Dolores Cortez & Maximo Bustos. Appeal rights discussed and explained. |